Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum VMS VENTURES INC. VMSTF

Bullboard (GREY:VMSTF)

View:
Comment by sawtooth1on Apr 02, 2016 10:59am

RE:RE:RE:RE:a successful no vote?

With an outstanding debt to HBM of some 20 million & Glen into the company for many millions no way could they fold the company someone would end up behind bars. As to selling NAN I think Sentent ...more  
Comment by colt45acpon Apr 01, 2016 4:50pm

RE:RE:RE:a successful no vote?

Well VMS management has stated thier is a pending drill program in the Reed MINE area waitng for the special meeting vote to be concluded.  IF they are going to fold the company why is the ...more  
Comment by geolithon Apr 01, 2016 4:02pm

RE:RE:a successful no vote?

A more likely solution to dissolution would be to raise $100 to 200k (maybe sell NAN?), terminate any and all employees except for the president and CFO who would be paid poverty wages for continuing ...more  
Comment by colt45acpon Apr 01, 2016 2:54pm

RE:a successful no vote?

Nezcasse where does it say a no vote means dissolution of the company. Who gave you that answer ? Please.
Post by nezcasseon Apr 01, 2016 12:34pm

a successful no vote?

considering the plight of the cash vms ... a negative vote will result in the dissolution of the company after delisting pure ... of course ...   so please govern accordingly ...!
Post by EStreeton Apr 01, 2016 12:33pm

VMS Reports Update on Reserves and Resources at Reed Mine

Reserves and Resources at Reed Mine   VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--(Marketwired - April 1, 2016) - VMS Ventures Inc. (TSX VENTURE:VMS) ("VMS Ventures" or the " ...more  
Comment by werdnapkon Apr 01, 2016 10:51am

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

So most of us agree the current takeover offer is complete garbage and I fully intend to vote no, but does anybody have any guesses to the outcome of a successful no vote?
Comment by colt45acpon Mar 31, 2016 7:02pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

For the persons with 100k VMS shares you get 39,203 RNC shares. SHARE OPTION;                                  ...more  
Comment by werdnapkon Mar 31, 2016 6:59pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

VMS has been overly silent for a long time now... much more so after partnering with HBM.  The shareholders have been left in the dark for the most part. If VMS gave me one good reason why I ...more  
Comment by colt45acpon Mar 31, 2016 4:53pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

Don't feel bad Buck65 thats about my average too. Like has already been said the reason for this plan are not clear and why isn't it. Seems like a lot others are thinking the same thing. jmo ...more  
Comment by Buck65on Mar 31, 2016 4:21pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

not too sure it will make a difference but i too will vote no....i bought into RNX on their IPO and paid 2.80...didnt seem to take too long and the price slid down to .40 when i finally had enough ...more  
Comment by colt45acpon Mar 31, 2016 3:30pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

Sawtooth1 I have to agree with you and on that note I HAVE VOTED NO. They haven't even got Royal Nickel SYSBOLS RIGHT. ITS RNX NOT RNC. tHINK WE NEED A LAWYER HERE. Any body know one. Can't ...more  
Comment by sawtooth1on Mar 31, 2016 1:00pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

Without further clification on the matter I think that us outsiders have no choice but to vote against the deal.JMO GLTA
Comment by sclurion Mar 31, 2016 12:43pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

The vote packgaes are deleivered in the first mail today. I am voting against it. I thought GP saw some merit in the inevestment when I saw his buys. And , I followed like a lamb only to be ...more  
Comment by sawtooth1on Mar 31, 2016 12:33pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:Vote

The Glen question is a mystery. Why would anyone in their right mind agree to a deal that pays back less than a third of their investment. We need to know what arrangement the company has made with ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities