Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Seabridge Gold Inc T.SEA

Alternate Symbol(s):  SA

Metals & Mining Gold
Seabridge Gold Inc. is engaged in acquiring, exploring, and advancing mineral properties, with an emphasis on gold resources, located in Canada and the United States. The Company holds a 100% interest in several North American gold projects. Its principal assets, the KSM project, and its Iskut project, are located in Northwest British Columbia, Canada's Golden Triangle, the Courageous Lake... see more

Bullboard (TSX:SEA)

View:
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... Next
Comment by fairdinkemon Oct 07, 2024 2:20pm

RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

The price tag for the tunnels is multiple Billions of Dollars, not millions.  So AMK does have a very powerful edge in getting first to the Ore processing plant/the "Mill". Plus they ...more  
74
Discussion
Comment by cskhurasuon Oct 07, 2024 1:35pm

RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

There are problems wth TUD's Slide 23 comparison table. First, there is no such thing as a gold equivalent. No one serious uses it. Second, the SEA numers are wrong...the KSM resources are ...more  
60
Discussion
Comment by NineLiveson Oct 06, 2024 2:56pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

Tele, that equates to about $1.80 per share for TUO. So even though TUO owns the nsr's plis 20% you're saying TUO could be bought cheaper than AMK's $207 million takeover.  20 ...more  
96
Discussion
Comment by GoldDigger60on Oct 06, 2024 12:32pm

RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

CSK. Check out slide 23 https://wp-tudorgold-2023.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-08-22-TUDOR_GOLD_CORP_Presentation.pdf
80
Discussion
Comment by GuruNNon Oct 06, 2024 4:41am

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

Seabridge should buy Teuton?   Never!   What advantage should Seabridge have from this?   Tudor, as 60% partner of the three Amigos, has contractually agreed with the 20 ...more  
106
Discussion
Comment by GoldDigger60on Oct 05, 2024 4:08pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

What are your thoughts of this?  Wouldn't it be less expensive if they upped the Cunningham offer on amk? Either one gives them 20%
74
Discussion
Comment by GoldDigger60on Oct 05, 2024 2:33pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

One can hope they're working on a solution 
71
Discussion
Comment by curtis111on Oct 05, 2024 1:17pm

RE:RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

I honestly think this is an easy issue to work together on. 
61
Discussion
Comment by curtis111on Oct 05, 2024 1:07pm

RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

You're right, but they need a permit. That's where this turns into an issue for Seabridge. They will not be granted a permit to go through mineralization
64
Discussion
Comment by GoldDigger60on Oct 05, 2024 11:20am

RE:RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

That's wishful thinking Except for TC not needing to spend how many millions on a tunnel?? It seems likely TC would be looked at more favourably by a major. 
67
Discussion
Comment by cskhurasuon Oct 04, 2024 8:19pm

RE:There you have it folks: Rudi and Ken

TC has no value to SEA. KSM has more than enough ore for the next hundred years and the TC ore is not compatible. With the LOO, SEA does not need TUD's agreement. TC has yet to prove it has an ...more  
99
Discussion
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... Next
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
{{currentVideo.headline}}
{{currentVideo.link1Text}}
{{currentVideo.link2Text}}
< Previous
{{moreVideoText}}
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities