Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF

Bullboard (GREY:IPHAF)

View:
Comment by Plato5on May 01, 2010 6:22am

RE: RE: priority review

Thanks for the teevee "creepy weird" characterization. That really does hit the nail on the head. Teevee's posts are like that. The personality behind those missives is impossible ...more  
Comment by WASKERWISKon Apr 30, 2010 2:18pm

RE: priority review

Player, TeeVee is a disingenuous, intellectually dishonest flake.  It is also very weird that he continues to post here.  Creepy weird.Anyway, FDA obviously doesn’t give priority review to ...more  
Post by player121on Apr 30, 2010 12:22pm

FDA request for further data

I think we need to remember that when Lux received fast track status back in August 2007 it was for the following reasons (directly from the news release):The FDA based its decision on the following ...more  
Comment by teeveeon Apr 30, 2010 12:09pm

RE: T minus 94 days and counting

Isn't it far more probable the FDA will come back with a request for more data, resulting in further delays? What percentage of NDA's  get through quickly?
Comment by Plato5on Apr 30, 2010 10:36am

RE: RE: SP Estimate on approval?

Thanks for the try. I was looking for reasoning not offering - other than an intuitive - a first iteration based on recent performance and disappointed expectations. But, I'll take your .76-2.04 ...more  
Comment by MementoMorion Apr 29, 2010 11:30pm

RE: SP Estimate on approval?

> perhaps we could offer a few rational estimates on where SP will go onapproval I don't mean to be rude, but I don't understand what was rational about your estimate. It seemed like you ...more  
Post by Plato5on Apr 29, 2010 10:23am

SP Estimate on approval?

Since we have little else to do perhaps we could offer a few rational estimates on where SP will go on approval for this indication. I'll throw out 0.75 on day one with a fall back to 0.60 the day ...more  
Post by Plato5on Apr 29, 2010 10:16am

T minus 94 days and counting

Until FDA approval (or not). Seems we are always counting. Patience is a virtue, no?
Comment by antoninuson Apr 28, 2010 10:39am

and by the way...

on balance, I think isa management has been ok. If I were grading it, I would give it a c+ to a b-they did develop a nice drug, they did get roche on board, they did attract paladin, who are an ...more  
Comment by antoninuson Apr 28, 2010 10:12am

RE: A Respose from Antoninus

gmscle, should I share with all what you previously inboxed to me last year? no, I dont stopp that low, unlike you.how ironic this all is...snowfield whiners deserve scorn as they KNEW ...more  
Post by gmcsleon Apr 27, 2010 5:52pm

A Respose from Antoninus

buddy antoninus2on 4/27/2010 3:10:30 PM Have I ever come after you or initiated any sort of conversation with you? what is it with you? do you fear that if I post some objective viewpoints on this ...more  
Post by BornReady1970on Apr 27, 2010 4:32pm

Are there any good actors out there?

I think we could make a very saleable pilot for a new sitcom. I'd call it "Day Traders" and I wouldn't need to pay any writers I have all the material I need right here on this board ...more  
Comment by antoninuson Apr 27, 2010 4:06pm

RE: Take a look at the FS

that means diddly. all it says it that they paid $191,000...who they paid is another story...fact is, you generally get what you pay for ....if you hire someone known with a track record and you ...more  
Post by player121on Apr 27, 2010 3:53pm

Take a look at the FS

Did you ever look at the financial statements?  For year end they stated that $191,000 was spent on external IR and public company costs.  I don't think she was "on her own ...more  
Comment by antoninuson Apr 27, 2010 3:44pm

RE: Agreed that everyone has a right but...

Having a public relations degree from richard ivey is great, and truly, she was a nice person, but again, how much better served would we all have been had they had her as a junior assistant ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities