RENZY - Hard to beleive they struck out on, Renzy.
Perhaps now that they have 100% ownership - they'll turn up the after burners....
lol
Read up on the hidtorical mining and geology.
I think they should consider " nickel " could be a secondary deposit washed in from the
N/W + N/E
Similar to a Y watershed washing in sulphides and serpentines.
Dumping into Renzy Lake....
I don't like where they drilled.
If the watershed " theory with non indigenous sulphides and serpentine were ever correct -
It would mean lakes nearby, or adjacent to Renzy, would have similar sediments that settled
with in the lower depressions which are now lakes...
Such as, Lac McKinnon.
Immediate west - literally kissing Renzy.
If i were to choose a color on their latest surveys... it would not be pink nor green,
It would be red - which would best match a watershed swath of, laying down sulphide and serpentine ores that potentially washed in with a - Y - pattern.
I can see the North west ( very acute angle ) more northerly,
that can still be seen on terrain mode maps - directly leading to Lake Renzy.
Hitting the north end of Rernzy, and west side of Renzy.
Also, passing right through Lake McKinnon, which is also a dpression.
Another north easterly path comes in from, Lake Alba.
Borth watershed swaths, hit lake Renzy.
No photos of rock specimens.
No drill cores.
And sadly.... no dril lresults seen in press as per - hole # 5 - which ihad pegged as a high potential location - based on watershed theroary and secondary sediments washed in.
How about the - assaying - should they do a retake using a different method to detect the nickel
especially in serpentines ?
Serpentine nickel can be a real bugger to detect since it might be in a solid solution vs
sulphide ores in a pyrite form ( eg - pentlandite or other )
Cheers.....