Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Kelt Exploration Ltd T.KEL

Alternate Symbol(s):  KELTF

Kelt Exploration Ltd oil and gas company. The Company is focused on the exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas resources in northwestern Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. The Company's assets are comprised of three operating divisions: Wembley/Pipestone in Alberta; Pouce Coupe/Progress/Spirit River in Alberta, and Oak/Flatrock in British Columbia. The Company’s British Columbia assets are operated by Kelt Exploration (LNG) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.


TSX:KEL - Post by User

Comment by PabloLafortuneon May 13, 2024 2:25am
51 Views
Post# 36036253

RE:RE:MD&A

RE:RE:MD&A If we assume that everything ran at full capacity in Q1 '23 (not '24) ie 32,000 boepd;

and we add 4,000 boepd @ Oak ('23 prodn was 4,500 so assume 5,000boepd was capacity with 25MMcf of NG processsing which is now 45MMcf);

and 7,500 boepd @ Wembley (Wembley produced 9,300 boepd in '23 with 34MMcf of processing capacity so napkin assume capacity was 10,300), then full capacity is now 43,500 and 90% of that (which is more or less Q4 '22 to Q3 '23) would be 39,300 boepd. Then add 50 MMcf @ CVS Albright and suddenly theoretical back of the napkin capacity is 58,500 boepd or 53,000 @90%. (all wild guesses).

The other very interesting opportunity to me is if and when everything is interconnected in Alberta, then you will eliminate the situation where you have spare capacity in one area but lack the right kind of wells there to make fully use of said capacity, while having the opposite situation in another area ie plant capacity is fully utilized forcing the company to shut in otherwise productive wells.

By the way, this would increase production not only by fully making use of all the plants, but also by prioritizing liquids rich wells (oilier wells don't need as much natural gas processing capacity @ a given level of production - this is obvious but many don't realize this _ another reason to focus on oil prone).
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>