RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Retraction and Consolidationmaxjac wrote: I'll have a look at the impacts and implications of using/showing the official historical value from Quadravest for the historical total fund value instead of the estimated value. It should be fine but I have to check first. I will update this board if I make any changes to that.
For the number of shares outstanding and the sales proceeds of the ATM program being already accounted for in the cash value of the October 31 update... Are we 100% sure they're already included?
Just want to be sure before starting to make changes to my code.
I would think that the OS share count and cash % is accurate to OCT 31 . And that is why I dont track the share totals of each holding. I only track/estimate the % of NAV for each as that takes care of any changes. I have been doing this for quite a few years now on several split funds, and many times I have been accurate to the penny.... Now when covered call action and changes to the weightings happen in the first 2 weeks of the month before the 15th update, we can be out at times up to 5 or 6 cents.. but that is something you cant control without a source giving you the info. But the 15th update gives you a hint of how close you were.. The effects of the retraction wont be known until after the November monthend , according Navgod , who has been involved in the retractions in a big way for a long time, and so he is the expert I defer to on these matters.