Post by
PabloLafortune on Jun 18, 2024 12:05pm
#1 WTI $81, Kelt $6.15
This is my amateur opinions and guesses
#1 Why? Because they drilled natural gas wells without proper hedges and natural gas prices in Alberta and BC are severely depressed at the moment. Not unlike the US, it will take time to rectify the situation although the commissioning of LNG Canada will certainly help. And like in the US, stock prices will eventually recover some (ex Antero was unhedged and SP went down to $19ish and is now $33).
Hopefully they learn their lesson not to drill wells that are predominantly natural gas without having hedges in place especially when you have the triply whammy risk of HH, AECO and Station2. (to add insult to injury they actually borrowed to do so).
#2 That said, the potential in Alberta is sky high IMO. They're doubling plant capacity from 116 in early 2023 to 241MMcf by 2025? Most of that (all?) will be filled with NG from liquids rich wells which means more oil and more overall production per MMcf of plant capacity. Morever, when they interconnect Wembley and Pouce Coupe, they'll be able to replace gassier production decline with production from oilier wells which will mean more oil and more production.
(In theory if every plant was fed with natural gas from wells that produce 40% oil, the boepd capacity from 241MMcf of plant capacity would be 66,000 boepd (26,667 bpd of oil. I'm thinking this is actually a metric that should be measured to see how effective your operation is).
#3 Kelt has done a wonderful job acquiring and developing the plays. Whether the management can get the job done operationally remains to be seen. If they continue to ignore the commodities' price reality and invest in weaker ROI wells, AND don't opportunistically hedge, then they'll eventually have to sell (which is fine too).* Plus they might want to do something about this SBC business.
GLTA
* right now due to low NG prices, they probably need to add some oil hedges is my guess to protect the cashflow and not end up like Birchcliff (paying something - capex in Kelt's case, dividend in Birchcliff's - you can't afford because you had no hedges in place - resulting in debt going up)
Comment by
gassygeezer on Jun 19, 2024 10:18am
Perhaps that 5.75% Tangerine rate/opportunity cost in their collective opinions made better economic sense?
Comment by
MyHoneyPot on Jun 19, 2024 10:33am
It beats the dividend on ARX, most of they holding by officiers are in kelt actual shares and 20% of their holding are options. Many of these options have expirey dates. So they needed to be sell. MHP IMHO
Comment by
MorganEarp on Jun 19, 2024 11:42am
MHP who gives a flyhing f u c k about ARX....we are annoyed with your $12 a share by the end of 2024 PUMP b.s. Meanwhile this pig flounders at under the price from December of 2023!!! As for the five thousand shares you pointed out, that was just a synopsis of a bigger cancer. If you would like I will psot all of the insider DUMPS....if that would please you more....F.F.S!!!!!
Comment by
Trapped on Jun 19, 2024 12:13pm
Lol he can't help it! He's obsessed with ARX and trashed it constantly on its SH board before he got shamed into leaving. They still refer to him there as 'He who shall not be named."