Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Kelt Exploration Ltd T.KEL

Alternate Symbol(s):  KELTF

Kelt Exploration Ltd oil and gas company. The Company is focused on the exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas resources in northwestern Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. The Company's assets are comprised of three operating divisions: Wembley/Pipestone in Alberta; Pouce Coupe/Progress/Spirit River in Alberta, and Oak/Flatrock in British Columbia. The... see more

TSX:KEL - Post Discussion

Kelt Exploration Ltd > Energy spells *** Opportunity ***
View:
Post by MyHoneyPot on Sep 09, 2024 1:29pm

Energy spells *** Opportunity ***

Looking at stocks like Meg who were buying back shares for an average price of $30.39 in Q2 that are currently trading around 24 dollars and while RBC capital has a price target at RBC capital of 39 dollars. (A 28% loss incurred by shareholders on those shares bought back shares, robbing shareholder of capital)

This clearly illustrates the problem with programmed systematic buybacks, in Q2 Meg bought back 2.2 million shares at a price 7 dollars higher then they are today. That is an evaporation of 15.4 million dollars in one quarter alone.

(I do agree with the narative that this returns capital to shareholder, it simply increase shareholder risk)


Right now the balance sheets are just to good at a lot of energy companies, which means they have fiscal flexibility to impact their capital structure.

Increase the size of the balance sheet with more assets gives companies opportunity to do strategic transactions that will improve their future, TOU just showed the market how it is done buying a company at a low point for a reasonable price, and grew production with premium assets. 

Taking the capital off your balance sheet means you have to issue shares like AAV did just after they were buying back shares? what gives, there are tons of costs associated with acquiring debt, and buying back shares. Now AAV looks highly leveraged, Veren has done the same thing, another share issue after a series of buybacks and the stock lingers in the $8.70 range you can't trust management. 

Today market i can equate to the low interest rate scenario, gas prices will not go lower, or maybe some bone dry gas prospect will have to shut down entirely (That would not be good for some companies), however we know LNG canada is coming on line towards year end. Oil prices are to low and it is going to slow down drilling in a tight market that is not over supplied. 

Time to add and hold in my opinion, with companies that know how to create value and are not evaporating it off the balance sheet and calling it return of capital are the place to be. 

IMHO
MHP
Comment by ztransforms173 on Sep 09, 2024 5:33pm
- I LIKE your DILIGENT and DETAILED ASSET ANALYSIS but your SCOPE of CAPITAL STRUCTURE is FLAWED - MEG BOUGHT their shares in Q2/2024 BELIEVING that the MARKET SHARE PRICE VALUATION was UNDERVALUING the INTRINSIC WORTH of the company's FUTURE CASH FLOWS {at the CURRENT 110,000 bbls/d BOP rate, MEG has RESERVES for 30+ years of production for Chistina Lake ALONE} - MEG has ALREADY SET ASIDE $ ...more  
Comment by MyHoneyPot on Sep 09, 2024 5:51pm
I appreciate what your saying, but no one hold a stock for 30 years. The share buybacks simply evaporate capital off the balance sheet, and the company is worse off from an enterprise value not having the capital on the balance sheet, as well as being less attractive for a take over.  The ability to provide dividend and special dividends or have cash on the balance sheet should demonstrate ...more  
Comment by Trapped on Sep 09, 2024 5:57pm
* Loosing should be *Losing * Evaluation should be *Valuation William, you must have a Leakey brain. You're an illiterate pump-and-dump artist who's way too excited about promoting a $6 stock.
Comment by Trapped on Sep 09, 2024 5:58pm
Also, can you please provide your opinion on share buybacks? We didn't hear you the first 350 times you stated it this week...
Comment by PabloLafortune on Sep 09, 2024 6:07pm
I don't agree with your share buyback analysis which I'll answer at another time but one thing I've noticed (anecdotal - could be wrong) is when oil and gas prices drop, E&Ps doing buybacks buyback less. Which could cause the share price to drop. Think about it: 1) 100,000 shares bought by retail/inst/hedge/ on any given day 2) 20,000 shares bought by company 120,000 sold by ...more  
Comment by MyHoneyPot on Sep 09, 2024 7:18pm
I agree, i would call it opportunistic share buybacks. (TOU, POU, Kel subscribe to that approach)  Another way to do share buybacks and rank the ability of the CEO, is to buy shares in another company that my have better assets (Because they do), or that may offer a better investment return than your company does, providing future growth strategies for your company. Buybacks of your own ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities