Bitcoin Fund Units Class A T.QBTC

Help please: QBTC Trading Price is below its Net Asset Value

[PeterKarwacki]

What is the issue please, isn't this a good thing? Can any body explain why this is a problem?
I have watch both videos. There would be a problem if the Trade price was signficantly above the Net Asset Value, but it is not.

[ScotiaOne]

It's only a problem if you are selling i.e. you won't get the unit price that the Bitcoin assets represent at true NAV. If you are long then it shouldn't be an issue. This isn't the type of fund that lends iteself to quick trades. My thoughts only...

[Moogul]

Yeah I think if I can park the emotional reaction I'm really starting to think this will get resolved in a smart way quite soon... Remember that these fund managers are extremely financially motivated to retain and grow AUM... As unit holders we have rock solid rights to the bitcoin held per unit (minus a 1.95% annual fee). Putting these two notions together along with the reality of a quickly

[balducci]

The following is cut and pasted from reddit (which is cut and pasted from yahoo).  [Btw, is it demeaning if I beg for some reputation/karma points. Lol.]    This is a cut an paste from a poster 'Dave' on yahoo: Yesterday morning I was concerned when I saw the differential between NAV and fund price. first thing I did was call 3iQ since I have a contact there (spoken to