RE:Hey markcs
onthepath it is really great you like your gas guzzler BUT many others do not and at least they are trying to do what they feel is environmentally right for the world. Whether evs are as clean as they are being touted that is a whole other thing as there are debates about that as there are on solar energy and panels. Now in regards to the 90 percent supply chain issue about evs the one you posted. Nobody here is doubting supply chain issues that was the whole reason just in case you haven't realized the company has moved away from it divested it to Ionix and yet you are going on about the company being a big swindler as it legally has been doing what is required by it to refocus on another area it feels will be more accessible and bring greater market value. So let me get this right people are pissed with the company for not having any product and revenue to this point and then use reasons why whether as starting to attack it or aggressive attack it when others are talking about the ev side of things yet ironically are actually acknowledging that supply chain is an issue and having evs manufactured and products come out is very challenging....so in other words the company is damned if it does or damned if does not and really given all this hot air has made the right decision to pivot and let both Ionix and Daymak keep pursuing the Ev etc while it works on its repivot to more the crypto side of things. Well I am not too sure what to say here other than keep kicking at the tires. Now just in case you and others have missed it the whole point as to why I called Julian was to establish credibility and truth and by extension whether Bryson and Abanete have a sincere desire to actually get things done or as to you who believes they do not and everything they are doing is full of lies shady fraud and scam. Apparently no....Ionix is supplying batteries to Daymak which powers their 3 wheeler what more can be said here other than good luck trying to do what you are trying to do. The company has followed all legal exchange requirements and with the company's best effort to get things done you will never be able to prove an intent to scam people. Whether businesses succeed or not is not ground for an investigation you are wasting your time and everyone else's over here BUT like I said if you feel that strongly about it go ahead I will not say much other than when you badger and attack another poster come at them with your points that is fair as are people needing to realize anything posted is fair game to be scrutinized. Now I have said I am keeping a neutral stance and as such I wanted the truth and have asked others to also seek it. I was and still not as concerned about the probabilities of success or not in terms of to whether the evs come out next year as I am about the truth. The fact that we are all talking about global supply chain issues warrants the pivot the company has made and felt it as the best choice to make monies and bring shareholder value which is the complete opposite of what people are claiming they do not care in trying to create an established and legitimate business. Now you are upset in how all this has been done BUT it has all been done by the books. It is not against exchange rules for companies to issue exchange approved shares for them to pay to acquire other companies pay debt share for debt settlement etc and they are not required to consult shareholders while conducting these transaction although are required to document all transactions and financials once every 3 months on Sedar that is it that is its requirements had the company been listed on the TSX Venture BUT because it is not it is required by the CSE to also issue monthly progress reports and has been doing so. As long as companies follow exchange rules they are not doing anything illegal. The company within its operating rights have also informed us what it has doing sure albeit after the fact which removes our ability to decide whether to dump or keep shares had we known. While this is not good to any of us as I understand we should make informed decisions and have heads up no company I know now aways gives people the heads up that they are doing a raise or any other thing. More than 10 years back when I was getting more familiar with pennies maybe 1 out of 100 or more stated in a press they intended to do a raise and the share value plummeted most started to do the raise already issued the press after while it was well into it stating what raises usually do and was already priced out with the release saying it is being done on a best effort which is typical. People dislike raises as it is BUT have mixed opinions as to them being oversubscribed as those favorable see the raise as favorable when lots of interest and getting potentially closed on the first tranche others not happy for further dilution at prices they feel betrayed and call cheap. Well all companies operate non differently than this. Those who are lucky have a longer sustained hype value so they don't keep doing raise at low stupid values which greatly devalues the company shares and I feel it is very unfortunate when that happens that being said that is to some extent immaterial when there are supply chain issues it will not change those facts and if the share values drop heavily what can companies do? Anyways we are flogging a dead horse here. Sure Markcs posts optimistically that is his opinion and sure if you call that pumping people can and should conversely say you are bashing and that too not in the rightful way. It simply seems you have lost too much money here and now fully blaming a company which legally is not blame worthy. Like I said I am sorry that you did so did I however as I started I blame myself knowing what I signed up to when gambling on stocks pennies or otherwise. People in my family are losing 10s of thousands within a month unrealized so far and they have established companies so these companies are not scam yet people will cry bloody murder even there and be pissed at them yet they will not say it is due to unfortunate market conditions. The people who read the tides being rough pulled their monies out a little less than a year ago around August I am reading. Now if these companies are taking hits what to say those who are trying to get established? In any case we clearly disagree from our perspectives and I will agree to disagree however as I said as all posts are open to scrutiny as you have did so with Markcs I have done so with yours ok he is pumping and I see you as persistently bashing you both have every right to do whatever it is BUT I think you are badgering him a bit too far so I have responder. You can't seriously expect him or anyone else for that matter to get a vehicle which is not available and will likely have a challenge getting off production in normal capacity BUT it doesn't mean they don't either exist or the intention to bring to market is not there. Even so it also doesn't mean if they are available everyone who gambled here will either want or buy one for their own personal reasons which simply makes your comment a personal attack and asinine to shame him just saying. Anyways that is my two cents worth and posts will always be open to all this squabbling back and forth and something I guess is the purpose for these boards but not in a disrespectful way which you did not I am not questioning that but it comes off as quite personal just saying. This is why we give an opinion and can't let what others think bother us it is what it is.