Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Lumina Copper Corp LCPRF



GREY:LCPRF - Post by User

Comment by kroghon Oct 18, 2012 9:29am
106 Views
Post# 20497295

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: In

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: In

You are claiming lots of disagreement. I agree with most you say, except the last part. Of course, a mine could be built without Salta's cooperation. But if a JV is being negotiated then all is fine. And yes, if there was a mine at Salta's claims, the tailings dam could be placed on Lumina's claims.

Copper mines are giant projects. Thousands of workers will be relocated, private property is expropriated in some cases etc. An exloration license will not stop a mine. But all of this is hopefully hypothetical.

More constructively, where do you have your information that a JV has already been aggred on. Are you an insider in Cacadero?

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>