Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Electra Battery Materials Corp. V.ELBM

Alternate Symbol(s):  ELBM

Electra is building North America’s only fully integrated, localized and environmentally sustainable battery materials park, which will host cobalt and nickel sulfate production plants, a large-scale lithium-ion battery recycling facility, and battery precursor materials production, to become a reliable supplier to both North American and global EV and battery supply chains.


TSXV:ELBM - Post by User

Comment by WernerDon Sep 24, 2021 4:30am
238 Views
Post# 33912799

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FCC Working Capital

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FCC Working CapitalI didn't ask what a cash burn rate means in general. But thanks for the clarification. I asked where the affected person sees a high cash burn rate at the FCC now or in the future. If so, I would be very grateful for his presentation. If possible, with reference to the source. Because, as he wrote on September 22nd, he apparently assumed a very high cash burning rate. Or how is his statement "As soon as they (FCC) disclose how much money they burn to set this refinery on fire, the lenders will have less confidence. It's a money pit, period" understand differently?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>