RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:why the drop?
Perhaps the reason for the negative reaction to this PR is that it is not very informative or half-informative. We are informed of a discovery of a new Carlin-type discovery based on one hole and although the wording reads the detected anomaly is "shallower than the IP interpretation .." the recorded depths suggests it is not likely to be mined by surface methods. Also, the PR indicates the presence of oxidized pyrite and other indicator minerals but no assays are given. Perhaps investors are reading that the assays are too low and that is the reason they were not announced and that is PR is just diversion tactics.