EarthLabs Inc V.SPOT

News - SPOT aids hi-grade find for Sterling in Nfld

[Flyder]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6AWOqWqBTk

[GABY51]

A  RIEN  COMPRENDRE  AU  LIEU  DE  MONTER  IL  BAISSE 0.89, VA  T-IL  ALLER  A  AU  MOINS  1.50    EN DCEMBRE   TRIMESTRE  FINISSANT  LE  30 SEPT

[morecents7]

I think that is a pretty hard question to answer, at least on this forum. Depends completely on how people are valuating the company. Most people on this forum I assume expected it to be at 1.50 already, but the market has disagreed.   The p/e ration seems unbelievable low, but obviosuly not to everyone. The price of gold is obviosuly a factor and it is heading lower. the stock market in

[Sciencegeek1]

Not sure investors are looking at the best assets of the company here.  Every agreement they sign and work on expands the dataset available to them to train and refine their AI algorithm.  It's that access to a large and expanding dataset that for me is the real value in the company and to any company who may consider acquiring them in the future.  The fact that they are

[compoundX]

Great insight and great points. I averaged up from .32 cents sitting around .69 right now.    Not even going to consider selling until 2025. 

[morecents7]

I did note the mining magazine article described goldspot's AI approach as going in wth an exprt team to refine and collect "good data" so that the AI was optomized for the task. I recall someone in the mining business saying to me that all the techn in the world was no good if your data was subpar.  Team plus the AI should be a powerful force, and having a stake in the results

[Possibleidiot01]

Back on July 29th , I posted a comment under the heading of "Historical comparable" . morecents7 asked "Depends completely on how people are valuating the company.." Would a purchaser be interested in Goldspot as solely a technology company ? When I think about this question - I woud think any purchaser like Dassault would see the royalties as something they could use to ( by

[morecents7]

I think that is a useful point of view. Although there is the value of the shares themselves as opposed to the royalties (although future connected ultimately).  There is also the roster of technicians and consulting and such that compliment the tech. I'd say that if it were just the software, the risk would feel much higher, as pure tech/software is a competitive field and hard to